READERS: What are your thoughts on this?
We received this note from one of our readers, and she asked us to share with you. In fact the very one who asked this question back in November. Here is an update on her situation:
I am now 7 months pregnant and got sacked yesterday for no cause! HR even said there was no cause and the manager who fired me had been writing me praise filled emails for my work (I was working 80 – 100 hr weeks on an important project, while pregnant and caring for my 1 year old.) I believe I was fired for being pregnant. I was tipped off a few weeks ago that the employer had hired someone to replace me. Under Canadian law, they need to hold your job for you while you're on mat leave for up to 1 year. So they probably didn’t want to hold it for me. My employer is a major publicly listed company. I am currently reviewing my legal options.
Yesterday was really painful…I’m sitting there- with my stomach out to HERE (I’m 7 mos pregnant but look 9!) being fired by a man who only a month ago had praised my hard work and skills…then being told to pack up my desk, give back my computer and be outta there in an hour…after 3 years of loyal employment. As he is leading me out the door…examples of my work (advertising posters I made for the company) are lining the entrance of the main hallway at the office.
I know your blog is mom friendly and light hearted…and I love the advice, recipes, etc. But I just wanted to tune the readers in to the career repercussions of baby bunching… Being pregnant with #1…then coming back to work pregnant with #2 can be a career crippler. And I am living proof. I am sure I’ll move onto to bigger better things… But this sure sucks right now… How am I supposed to look for another job or go to interviews…with my belly looking like I am about to pop. And now I also have to deal with the financial, emotional stress and hit to my self esteem for the rest of the pregnancy.
Please share this as a cautionary tale…
Career Mom of Soon to Be 2
(My DD is 16 mos… Baby #2 due June 7).
oh man, I had some advice for you, but I've got nothing. Just wanted to say that sucks and I so sorry you're having to deal w/ it right now.
It seems like it should be illegal to fire you for being pregnant. I would definitely check into it.
Posted by: kelly | Apr 22, 2010 at 01:49 PM
Motherhood IS my career.
Posted by: Karla | Apr 22, 2010 at 01:50 PM
Very upsetting indeed. Don't let the hormones and stress and exhaustion keep you from pursuing your legal options!
Posted by: Rachel O. | Apr 22, 2010 at 02:12 PM
That is completely unfair. You should look into both your legal options, and other job options--maybe a work from home job. Maybe this is a chance for you to find your dream job! Try to keep up positive thoughts as you deal with this stress.
Posted by: Michelle | Apr 22, 2010 at 02:27 PM
So sorry this happened to you! Not sure of the laws in Canada, but in the US it seems like you would easily win this case as long as there was no record of a performance issue. I hope you printed out the positive/praise emails from your boss--those would be excellent evidence in your support. Agree w/others to balance the negative w/the positive. Clearly this employer stinks, and down the road this will probably turn out for the best...but hard to see that when you're very pregnant and forced to job hunt. I agree there are career repercussions to baby bunching - although ususally not this severe!
Posted by: Cori | Apr 22, 2010 at 02:59 PM
That is truly awful. You need to take some time out to calm down and work out your options. In the UK this would be illegal and unless your employer can show that there was a really 'GOOD' reason why you were no longer suitable for the job they have acted completely against the law. You need to collate as much evidence as possible that you were performing well in your job. I hope that you do feel you can take action against them. Good luck and try and stay calm.
Posted by: Clare D | Apr 22, 2010 at 03:11 PM
Oh wow. I worked as an HR manager before becoming a SAHM. I don't know Canadian laws and this post doesn't give enough details, but just from what I see - you should definitely pursue your legal options. If you lived in CA you would collect enough money from that lawsuit to last you for at least two more pregnancies and a house... with a lake. Also, if you end up taking the to court try not to mention any of it to your new employer when looking for another job... It will just freak them out for no reason. Best of luck! and lots of ((hugs))
Posted by: mrs.notouching | Apr 22, 2010 at 03:15 PM
Urgh, that sucks. Though I am a big believer in long maternity leaves, I think this is an example of where it can work against you. I had my two exactly 2 years apart, but since I only took 3 months of leave with each (live in the US) it didn't impact my employer so badly.
Still, it sounds like you should have some recourse legally, as others say. it doesn't sound right that they can replace you. If the position was being eliminated that is one thing, but to lay you off and replace you with someone not pregnant, especially since it sounds like you were working really hard for them, sounds very wrong.
Posted by: geekymummy | Apr 22, 2010 at 07:18 PM
A new family member triumps a job that takes me that much away from my family in the first place. My baby and toddler need me more than any employer. I feel for her because I went through something similar but loosing that job was the best thing that ever happened because it was then I embraced motherhood as a career and a fullfillment that no job ever brought to my heart and life. Your outside job is not your identity, your a mother first embrace it. I dont think this is a cautionary tale but a blessing in disguise.
Posted by: Karen R. | Apr 22, 2010 at 08:44 PM
I am appalled by some of the comments. Of course we are all mothers first but for some of us financial reality makes being a SAHM impossible. I'm sure the author values her time as a mother and sees motherhood as a career but this does not excuse her employer from acting in an illegal manner.
I would think that moms, especially those of us with a bunch or with a soon to be bunch would be more supportive. Having two so close in age creates a unique financial and work situation.
Posted by: Elaina | Apr 23, 2010 at 02:58 PM
Elaina,
Appalled? Really? None of the comments I see here are in any way stating that what they did to her was the "right thing." No one here is saying that this woman is choosing her career before her children. What I see here are other moms who are supporting her and encouraging her.
Appalled? I think you're being oversensitive and making a big deal out of non-existant drama.
Posted by: Karen | Apr 23, 2010 at 10:02 PM
Yes Karen, I stand by my word choice. I think you need to read through the comments again. While for some being laid off may be a blessing for those of us who cannot afford to be unemployed it is not.
Posted by: Elaina | Apr 26, 2010 at 10:02 AM
I agree with Elaina's word choice as well. It really does bother me when commenters turn a truly awful situation into a SAHM vs Working Mother argument. Both are valuable and worthwhile. Everyone here knows what the writer meant by Career and that she wasn't saying SAHM is not a valuable career. Why can't we just come together and support each other in our decisions regardless of whether we work "outside of the home" or not?
Posted by: Lori | Apr 28, 2010 at 11:03 AM
When you are in uncomfortable position and have got no money to move out from that, you will require to receive the personal loans. Just because it will aid you emphatically. I take short term loan every time I need and feel myself OK just because of that.
Posted by: VELASQUEZMegan22 | Sep 22, 2010 at 10:31 PM